Comments for Keyword Spy Pro

Comment on Are Chrome’s ‘usage statistics’ used in evaluating site speed? by Aquarezz

Aquarezz — Mon, 09 Aug 2010 11:03:22 +0000

LoL @ Blind Five Year Old

Comment on Are Chrome’s ‘usage statistics’ used in evaluating site speed? by figurethis2

figurethis2 — Fri, 06 Aug 2010 11:25:45 +0000

yeh the auto play is annoying, cheers for the vid though Mat

Comment on Are Chrome’s ‘usage statistics’ used in evaluating site speed? by hundsim

hundsim — Wed, 04 Aug 2010 19:49:41 +0000

Why answering a question when you’re not sure about the anwer?

Comment on I have a great list of keywords for my website. How can a mask them so they are SEO friendly? by Doug k

Doug k — Wed, 04 Aug 2010 02:08:51 +0000

Search engines use what are called meta tags. That’s generally what they look for when indexing your site. These keywords won’t be visible when a user goes to your site unless they right-click on the page and say "view source" or something.

In other words, they aren’t visible unless someone goes to look for them specifically. You CAN NOT hide them any more than that. If you do, the search engines won’t be able to find them.

Comment on Are Chrome’s ‘usage statistics’ used in evaluating site speed? by imrankhanseo

imrankhanseo — Wed, 04 Aug 2010 00:27:57 +0000

I have used Chrome, Mozilla, Flock and every browser..

Chrome is built for Adwords and Google products run’s on it very fast.. as compare to mozilla because we have lot many add on’s in Mozilla firefox but as per SEO’s love to use Mozilla Firefox.

Yes Matt that’s right;

Thanks for the Info

Regards
Imran Khan

Comment on Are Chrome’s ‘usage statistics’ used in evaluating site speed? by freekzero

freekzero — Tue, 03 Aug 2010 01:02:21 +0000

btw, pretty frustrating when the new “Your feed” bar at the bottom of the screen forwards you to the next video when you’re part way through composing a comment and you lose your text. Especially when you have turned Autoplay off several times already.

Comment on Are Chrome’s ‘usage statistics’ used in evaluating site speed? by freekzero

freekzero — Tue, 03 Aug 2010 01:00:43 +0000

Matt, I love that you talk to webmasters like this and thank you for it, but there is one major criticism I think you need to address: you are always saying “i believe/I think/as far as I know”. At the end of the day this isn’t entirely useful. People ask you questions because you have access to the definitive answers, not just because you are quite knowledgeable. It would go a long way to ending online SEO/Google-focused arguments if you could give authoritative answers. Thanks.

Comment on For website optimization, are keywords and description in the source code important? by JEFF Q

JEFF Q — Tue, 03 Aug 2010 00:07:54 +0000

Content-rich text is absolutely more important than keyword and description meta tags. Here’s a lowdown on the top 3 engines:

Google:
Keyword metatag … completely useless!
Description metatag – completely useless for ranking purposes, but Google will pull the description into the accompanying desription in the search results, which makes it valuable.

Yahoo:
Keyword metatag … does help ranking, although only a very small impact
Description metatag – does help ranking, although only a very small impact

MSN:
Keyword metatag … no value
Description metatag – no value

Comment on Are Chrome’s ‘usage statistics’ used in evaluating site speed? by ugerWadi

ugerWadi — Mon, 02 Aug 2010 17:11:09 +0000

@BOBXLII Yeah you are right. The loading time is little bit slow. But they have fixed this issue in firefox4. BTW I am willing to give this sacrifice in favour of other cool features that FF has. But in the end everyone decides his own preferences and you gotta respect them…….

Comment on Are Chrome’s ‘usage statistics’ used in evaluating site speed? by BOBXLII

BOBXLII — Mon, 02 Aug 2010 16:46:16 +0000

@ugerWadi Firefox would be awesome if it didn’t take 5+ seconds to load on my machine.